You know that tweet by Laurence Fox about Reform standing down that was a bit… odd. Well here’s something else
To save you looking it up… Andrea Jenkins, Brendan Clarke-Smith, Marco Longhi and Karl McCartney
Could be put in a number of threads but this is the most appropriate I think
Farage on Laura K. Not withstanding the question of why he’s on again and this is isn’t a post in support of him (obvs)
First Question… (not verbatim)
”You’ve decided to run and many people are saying you running will let Kier Starmer in, why do you want Labour to win?”
What? That is literally a Tory attack line.
Would that question be asked to any other party? Why are you standing and won’t that let Labour in? That is absolutely shocking.
Edit: and then Mel Stride is on and he repeats the line (which is ok) but qualifies it with “and you yourself even asked the question”
For those that are sceptical about how important tactical voting will be… an article about it and how both Labour and the LibDems are organising in Hertfordshire. The parallels with 1997 where tactical voting gave us The Portillo Moment are strong and you’d have to suspect in the internet age will make it much more prevalent this time around.
Guardian
You are exactly the same, that’s the point, you have biases, we all do. But in that post you quoted, the poster acknowledged theirs and that is the difference.
Your post was an attempt to devalue someone’s opinion because it was biased.
Imagine saying to someone your opinion has less validity because you know of people who have actual lived experience. Absolutely mental thing to say.
Do you realise how ridiculous that sounds? You aren't allowed to express an opinion on something because … you know someone affected. What?
A jury is a VERY specific thing, with very specific rules
Here’s the grift… it’s a limited company you dinwits
What are they getting in return for their £25?
Not any influence on policy and I trust 20% is going to the exchequer