bickster
-
Posts
49,064 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
132
Content Type
Gallery
Downloads
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Store
Events
Everything posted by bickster
-
Erm what is it called and what label. There’s a decent amount of stuff I don’t have on there to justify it’s purchase
-
Didn't Dave Clarke make all his money from buying the rights to loads of '60s music progs off the tellybox like Ready Steady Go for next to nothing He's massively wealthy but its largely off the back of other peoples work and not his own.
-
I’m not sure what point you are making
-
Because 48% voted remain, to stay in the EU, the status quo. They knew exactly what they were voting for. There is no other way to interpret that. It’s not my opinion, it’s the facts of the matter So when you said no-one knew what they voted for it is demonstrably wrong. The only people that didn’t know what they were voting for was a huge proportion of the 52% and it’s generally people in the 52% that say “no-one knew what they were voting for” because they equate themselves with “everyone”
-
Could actually be worse, could be Rees-Mogg. Definitely the pair of them top the repressed by Catholic Guilt homosexual in the closet league
-
I think you'll need to add some ketchup to this claim
-
I have Gove in the office Tory Date Rape Drug Sweepstake
-
Nothing that comes out of Street Helens should ever be considered normal
-
Not this again. 48% did know exactly what they were voting for Its absolutely incorrect to say that no-one knew
-
Cathal Coughlan of Microdisney / Fatima Mansions gone at 61. Very under rated talent, such a sad loss
-
Its defined as knowingly presenting false information. There should always have been a supplementary question. Can the Prime Minister tells if his answer was No there was No party or No he can't tell us.
-
That Labour question is badly worded "Can the Prime Minister tell the House of Commons if there was a party in 10 Downing Street on 13th November..." He answered. No. i.e. no he can't tell the House They'll have to do better than that (and there are many many many better examples of him lying to the House)
-
AKA Mathieu Berson syndrome
- 24,118 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- season 2022/3
- speculation
- (and 1 more)
-
There's at least 6 non-Johnsons in that picture
-
Could be relevant...
-
Modern journalist using sloppy language I'd imagine She's probably only been covering the folder it's in with wallpaper for extra house points
-
She wasn't. This meeting is supposedly after the investigation had finished
-
Well, my thought on that was redactions maybe? Though there is a suggestion about the use of photographs but that may fall under the same general banner I guess
-
This meeting is after the report has been written though isn't it? I was under the impression that it was last month after even some of the initial fines had been handed out How did the idea that this meeting took place come out in the first place? (I genuinely don't know) One thing is for sure, the culture of lying from 10 Downing St hasn't changed and I think at this stage that is the most important thing to note here
-
Its also the classic move of the useless f***ers "Look at me... working" The more trivial the content, the more it veers toward a useless word removed that sent it. or Its actually used as a bullying tactic too (possibly both at the same time)
-
Already happens "I've just bought 17 different versions of the new Beach Boys re-release, just had to be done"
-
Has he signed them?
-
What pisses me off is when people react to such stories with "What is wrong with people", when its clearly A person singular.. A singular evil / mentally ill person There is nothing wrong with people EDIT: Maybe I should explain this. This is a story about a bad person. It is not a story about the breakdown of society. The media will have you believe there is because they feed off this paranoid delusion and every time a comment is directed at "people" when it is just one person to blame annoys me because the media loves people to feel like there's something wrong in society when generally there isn't
-
Yes definitely true
-
It’s still a monumentally rubbish idea and isn’t democratic
