Is that deliberately scuffed with actual scuffs or is it part of the printed design?
If it's part of the printed design, I think I'm ok with that, I've got a few that look deliberately aged but its all photoshop and that design will always be the cover. That's been going on forever
But if its deliberate vandalism to the sleeve to make it look old, that can get to F*** because it will not help you protect your record as long
Yeah but those cuts are the deepest
I was trying to manufacture a Roberta Flack gag but failed
FWIW I tend to agree, with a very rare exception (My Bloody Valentine springs to mind). most albums I can't tell the difference. I also think Gatefold Sleeves for single albums can generally sod off too. Single albums on Heavyweight vilyl in gatefold sleeves take up the space of about 3 or 4 normal albums on the shelves
Sounds like @tonyh29 did some work and it failed the test not passed it with flying colours
It's f***ing stupid because it's legitimate use is the opposite. If you drop something you remove it from the roster not newly add it to the roster
I said above that its an outside chance of Truss vs Mordant. I do think its the least likely of the three major matchups but its certainly possible
And the more Sunak appears to tank with the grassroots, the stronger the chances of defections from the Sunak camp
From what I was reading the other day from multiple sources Chornobaivka is now so close to the front line around Kherson that storing ammunition there is just monumentally stupid even if you remove the history of the previous 26 - 29 direct hits on the place. From the look of this map its about 10 miles which is what others were claiming
Everyone's entitled to a considered opinion but c'mon, she's thick as mince (apart from Maths)
I hope it's Truss too because she's a one woman festival of gaffes
Or Truss.
I think it'll come down to Sunak vs Mordor or Sunak vs Truss.
I don't expect Sunak to win against either
If it was Mordor vs Truss, which is possible but not that likely I think Mordor will win that too
Not had a chance to look at the figures yet though
I don't get it
Do they really think your average voter will care about the subtle difference between "This Government" and "The Prime Minister"
Most people will still see a Government removing their own PM, and replacing it with AN Other and then having confidence in the Government lead by the former leader
Most people will view this after the refusal of Labour's motion to be "playing politics" and also see the Govt having confidence in what they don't have confidence in
Oh and the Johnson cheerleaders will just says, if you have confidence in the Government why are you getting rid of Johnson risking losing its most ardent support to other parties or abstention
Labour by the very act of proposing the original motion and having it refused got their point across already
Do they understand that when you are in the shit you don't dig deeper?
Have you done any sort of in depth analysis and compared the actions of post-war governments of both hues and balanced the positives and the negatives each achieved and come to that conclusion?
Or did you just read The Sun before you wiped your arse?
Depends how you view it I think.
Badenoch is a right wing nutter on principal
Braveman is just a lunatic with no brains
Truss is the continuity Johnson candidate I think (and watch her rise in the grassroots standings when this becomes apparent)
Mordaunt is just a Union Jack
Sunak appears to be a very Marmite character in the party and the grassroots
Zahawi, Tugendhat and Hunt are also rans I think (as is Braverman fwiw)
So 8 through to the next (absolutely pointless) stage of getting to 30 signatures
Sunak, Truss, Tugendhat, Braverman, Zahawi, Mordaunt, Hunt and Badenoch