bickster

Oh yes, mine definitely wasn't a comment on the efficacy of what they did. Utterly stupid and ineffective law designed to incite and placate throbbers and does nothing to tackle the real issue. They don't even recognise the real issues

No, really, it really really wasn't that. You need to listen to the interview and the question that was asked.

I thought they made it illegal to cross the channel to claim asylum. I might be wrong but that is certainly the way it was reported

I think you did miss something, they are criminals in the eyes of the UK law (first law the throbbers passed oon this issue) but not in the eyes of International Law. The UK Law is yet to be tested in an international court Her KC is honorary, she didn't earn it she gained it when she became Attorney general (A political appointment) unlike almost every other KC. As a barrister, she didn't rise above the C-Panel (the lowest level)

FOr a brief second I thought you were Dem posting about a Man City press conference

Wordle 676 3/6

shocked not shocked

There's plenty of new music types that I didn't put in bold, that I'm not particularly a fan of on that list because it's still what the station should be about (like that Billie Marten and Benefits) but an awful lot of that stuff in bold is over-produced, autotuned pop bilge, the videos to which you just know will have some sort of choreographed dancers etc. It's formulaic pop crap

Yep, that's a full on Daily Mail opinion (its almost exactly what their front page says). Don't shoot the messenger If you wanted to piss off the government whilst working in his job, that statement is pretty much bang on exactly what you'd say. The government can't criticise it because it's true. It'll also annoy the hell out of vast swathes of the population. Aim you're towards the Government. He's telling you like it is

Says someone with a pre-sale link

The decimation of RIley & Coe from 5 hours to 2 and presenting together is an absolute travesty of almost Craig Charles proportions I'm also noticing more and more "dance" music and "well known songs" creeping into the schedules in shows where they didn't used to happen. I'm not talking obscure electronica from MAH, I'm talking bollocks like K-Klass and big artists like REM and Bowie appear to being played more regularly (nothing wrong with either but the proportions appear to be up). That new Underworld single something Red is on heavy rotation, now its alright and so are Underworld but that sort of thing never used to happen. Another one was that recent ACR single about the 80s NY graffiti artist, which again I like but it was on heavy rotation for weeks. It seems the content is being less controlled by the presenters and more by committee. Here's the current A/B/C Playlists There are quite a lot of what I would deem Non 6Music type artists on there.(in Bold). There are other places to play that stuff, where people who like that stuff listen. They really are trying to turn it into another mainstream pop channel, which is never what it was intended to be and isn't why people listen. Thats 13/33 or about 40% of the playlist It's the Charlesization of 6. Seriously getting on my tits now

I presume you mean inside lane even though its on the outside of the roundabout FWIW the are some roundabouts where that is perfectly legal, they did it to a roundabout at the exit of Formby where I used to live

No, they are my least best options in the front 8

So now I'm down to a straight choice between starting Rashford or Mac Allister. That's Rashford playing without Fernandes and a with a depleted defence but they are playing Spurs who just sacked their interim manager after 3 games. Vs Mac Allister who is playing woeful Forest. Currently its Mac Allister but looking at Rashford on the bench makes me feel uneasy

Approval ratings of the main parties. Only Labour with a positive number Tories have 52% with negative thoughts towards them

Ukraine a country currently involved in a little local territorial dispute at home, managed to get 180 odd Ukrainian & Georgian citizens out yesterday. That's a whole day ahead of us

And Aldi have also replied to an awful lot of their replies too

It seems the Abbott first draft excuse isn't being believed as she sent the email twice, three hours apart. Somebody at the Guardian appears to have leaked to the Jewish Chronical that the first time it was sent, she got an automated response telling her to add a postal address to the email. Which she did three hours later. Also that the email was sent from a personal account and not an official one, lessening the chances that an aide did it on her behalf. Yes, I know, the JC is hardly an unbiased participant in this.

Sod it, -4 Saka / Kane out - Salah / Jota In.

Yep makes sense I think Chilwell to Shaw is my move the following week As Salah's 0.1 increase last night prevents Trent

What is the other half of that deal that makes it sound less bonkers?

On a similar note...

I was considering either a -4 or rolling, still undecided I'm also going for the madness of benching Kane to play 5 across the middle but its a long time to 6pm and I may go Saka and Kane out for Salah and Jota It really is a dilema

Though you say that and... I still think your assessment is the correct one though. I just think the Kherson beachhead may just be a little bit more than a ruse. It's not going to be a main front for obvious reasons but if they can establish defence lines it will serve as a good base from which to make Special Ops incursions behind the lines aimed at key infrastructures. Any disruption to that supply line to Crimea will be a massive pain in the arse for RUssia.

In mint condition