bickster

Keep the noise down when you ejaculate

thats cheapish but the two by me are miles cheaper that anywhere in the country I think

Fuel watch, the 24 hour unmanned self services by me are now £1:38.9 for diesel and petrol. (Approx £6.25 per gallon) BP 300 yards away is steadfastly sticking to £1:59.9 for diesel and that's cheapish for the big brand petrol stations. 21p a litre difference or just shy of a £1 a gallon.

Crystal Palace? The dinosaurs that are nothing like what we think they were like now?

Jury coming after @chrisp65

Absolutely this.

FTFY

Oh get you Sam

Looks beautiful yet apocalyptic in this image The size of that fire indicates something bigger than a cigarette, a cigar maybe?

Wordle 679 4/6

Doubt it, he's pulled in millions since leaving office is speeches etc.

St Fagans?

Have you read their website? Its literally front and centre, it says what they plan to do and how they'll achieve it. It says pretty much what they've been saying in public, on crime, on the NHS and on the cost of living. I presume other policies are there somewhere or will be announced further down the line but they've already told us those and very early in the election cycle tbh. The idea that they are he same as the Tories is actually the same bollocks that the far left come out with. It isn’t true There are things to criticise Labour for and as I live in one of the safest Labour seats in the country, I won’t be voting for them. The only way I’d vote for them is if I lived in a marginal seat and they were the 1st or 2nd placed party with the Tories. Voting tactically to get the Tories out. But as that isn’t the case, I'll be voting for a party that is the right side of my two red lines, Labour isn’t and this week Starmer reiterated that he's on the wrong side of one of them, possibly the most important one. Electoral reform and PR, so I won’t vote for them

I think they've made it pretty clear tbh. And I say that as someone who isn't voting for them

Are those results weighted for the demographics that gave their opinion? Or is that just raw data which is absolutely meaningless?

Even leading slightly on Ukraine which is rather strange I think

The accuser and some say the person who pointed out Emmett Till to his racist murderers

Why would you need it to vote when it's never been a problem voting without one? ID also cost money ID required to vote also hasn't been very well advertised And FWIW it will hurt the Tory Prty more than Labour as the younger you are, the more likely you are to have ID and the more rural you are, the less likely you are to return to the ballot box with your ID. It is a Tory attempt to deny certain elements their democratic right and I expect it to bite them on the arse. Also your idea that wanting to vote and having ID are somehow connected is very odd

I see the utter dimwit David Davis has managed to be right for the third time in his career in calling for the need for voter ID to be pushed back in case hundreds of thousands of people are denied a legitimate vote. Yes, his motivation maybe that the Tories will f*** themselves over with this policy but he's at least semi-correct again.

The obvious answer is sometimes just too obvious for those with a penchant for bacofoil headwear

It could have gone in the AI topic but its far too funny for that.

Doesn't really matter, it's not just him that is a stooge, there are others and they'll just appoint another anyway

Wordle 678 4/6