bickster

Our dining table was bought from Swedish Hell, for what it is it really wasn't expensive. Far cheaper than any comparable product in other shops. Solid Wood. It's been through two house moves unscathed. I doubt you'll find a new product cheaper. IKEA gets a lot of stick (rightfully in a lot of instances) but once you move above the basic level stuff the quality isn't as bad as people make out and the prices are rarely beaten for comparable products

When is someone going to say that Israel built the tunnels? It's really odd that it's never mentioned by either side

Wordle 884 3/6*

His dad seems like he was a bit of a lad, he was sent to England from Ireland because he seduced the maid, living with an aunt…. Yep he he seduced her maid too Though in fairness he did marry her as she was Joss Auckland’s mother

Joss Ackland gone at 95

So what is the third way between misogynistic and not? Does it have a name?

Yeah advertisers and google though innit

Isn’t that East / West divide also the divide between the sensible voters and the nutter voters? If that is the case, it is clearly acceptable to call them the dirty bastards

One for @StefanAVFC and @fightoffyour

Well it’s not nudity is it, she wearing something. It’s something revealing but does the same apply to a female walking around in a tight top that shows her shape? What difference does it make on a beach? Why is it acceptable there and nowhere else? No one is forcing you to look at anything either Would it bother me if a waiter got his cock out whilst serving me, well yes obviously it would, there’s a hygiene issue for starters. That is a situation where inappropriate would be the correct choice of word.

See I don’t even get why it was inappropriate, it was the GQ awards, there are plenty of women who have attended awards shows from the Oscars downwards in similar attire. The outfits are often lent to them by the designers, hell sometimes they might even get paid to wear them. It’s exactly at such “red carpet” events that such items are worn. I'm not going to post the images here, cos VT guidelines but history is littered with hundreds and thousands of women who have worn similarly revealing outfits to awards ceremonies. I think you have to ask yourself why you were so aggrieved by this instance and seemingly not the others.

This is demonstrably nonsense. Images of women and their breasts as an erotic motif have been present in paintings since at least the Renaissance period

Bacofoil don’t need the income boost this close to Xmas but they seem to be getting it anyway

He pretty much said that it wasn’t going to happen on LK's programme. That story is based on him refusing to announce any of the budget measures he’s going to announce to parliament. (Which is unusually for this government the correct approach)

Here’s a fun lobbying fact. Kier Starmer has been a member of Labour friends of Palestine and the Middle East There is also a Labour Friends of India, Japan, Taiwan… Never gets a mention In fact, here's Kier Starmer speaking at a meeting of the Camden Palestine Solidarity Campaign just for you know, shits and giggles the bloody Zionist . I believe that banner behind him says Kick Israeli Racism out of FIFA. He's been bought by the bloody Palestinians, he has, it’s obvious

Remind yourself how this conversation strand started. The article made a claim with absolutely no evidence. It stated something as fact that at best was an opinion based on nothing and at worst yet another AS trope. It seems to be a recurring theme throughout the website The facts as stated in the article are the problem, it’s the conclusions they jump to based on the facts. The facts as stated are common knowledge the conclusions drawn from them flew over the cuckoos nest

What the flying duck do you think a humanitarian pause in the fighting is?

Well I’ve already pointed out one. I can’t be arsed pointing out any more because I'm off out to earn some money. But here’s a clue, the entire website is full of conspiracy theory nonsense. ”Declassified has found out that the USAF is flying some planes over the Med” yeah we can all use Flight Radar. There are very few sources. I mean they even called the SAS being based in Cyprus a potential war crime.

We’re talking about Labour here, just so you know, in case you didn't, they don’t have any say at the UN

Exercising your right to make an informed decision isn’t a reason not to take a vaccine, someone taking a vaccine could say exactly the same thing. It’s not a reason. It’s a bullshit statement not a genuine reason.

Nope, that again isn’t a reason, its something everyone hopefully does. The mere use of the word exercising though suggests that it’s something one actively had to sort of opt out of which takes it into the realm of something a right whopper might say.

So this declassified website ran this story… Declassified.org The entire story is that because only 96 MPs signed the EDM, the rest support the bombing of Gaza. Then I found out that Lowkey is in the board Oh and the person that wrote that utter nonsense is their Head of Communications Then there’s the article by the two lead journalist that insist that the ICC investigate Sunak, Cleverly and Shapps as the UK was involved in war crimes in Gaza (their words) in no less that seven ways, one of which was that the SAS are stationed in Cyrpus to help relocate any UK citizens held hostage by Hamas should they be liberated. That article was so full of holes it would put a Swiss cheese to shame No ta, websites full of nutjobs

Oh cripes, it’s like the whole ceasefire / pause in fighting conversation never happened. I'm not going to ask you explain the difference because no one has managed to explain the difference yet LFI has the exact same line as Labour - humanitarian pause in the fighting, which correct me if I'm wrong isn’t exactly being taken on board by Israel right now, so why are LFI, Labour and Starmer saying this if Starmer has been “bought”. Has he been bought by the Humanitarian Pause in Fighting subsection of this Israeli lobby? You aren't making any sense if I'm honest

Well no, I don't have to but you should. You're the one using it right now

See, here we go again. Is there a source for this claim? Because quite frankly from what I know (very little) it seems like a wild wild claim and you know, is bordering on… yep that good old AS trope