Two people own 52% of ENIC, the other 48% is owned by other smaller shareholders - Ian its a consortium whether you agree or not
Sugar is irrelevant as he owns shares in Spurs not ENIC
And as I said I agree with your substantive point - much prefer a single owner despite Ellis - the positives outweight the negatives imo as long as its the RIGHT single owner in the first place
Wassat got to do with the price of fish
ENIC only owns approx 30% of Spurs but, ENIC is essentially an investment company with individual shareholders within ENIC. Ellis & Petchey have never formally and legally been together as shareholders of a separate investment company that in turn effectively controls AVFCPLC
This has to be the biggest landslide poll I've ever seen on here, most votes and virtually all for the same option.
I've gone for Lerner purely because of a) the way he's gone about his business and what the Browns fans have said about his style of ownership
If there was a poll for least favoured bid, it would have to be that of the "Lifelong Villa Fan's"
I thought HDE had 38% and Petchey 20%?
Hardly the vast majority.
When you factor in that at least 10% of the shareholding is deemed to be "missing", it is quite a lot tbh
if they decide nothing, I doubt we'll hear
if however as expected they do decide to recomend a particular bid then they will have to report that to the LSE
Its not the first time I've seen it said but it is the first time I've seen mention of it in actual print
its been in a couple of the nasties before, that's why in general its been ignored.
I think its been mentioned on one of the poorer radio progs as well
Well that would explain it then, don't read those papers and don't listen to radio shit