Its an audiophile response. I'm not an audiophile. I have a decent inexpensive HiFi. Its not all about the quality of sound. It's about the whole package, the experience, the reading of the sleeve notes, actually being able to see the artwork, the inability to easily skip tracks you don't like, you have to listen to the whole thing. CDs are good for sound, I get that but they are also instant and disposable. CDs rarely hold memories for me, vinyl on the other hand seems to remind me of an awful lot of life events. The CD era also seemed to bring forth the era of chucking as much shit onto an album as possible, standard album lengths went up from 40 minutes to 70 and the extra half an hour was generally shite. Bonus tracks are rarely any good, generally worse than your average B side in the 7" era.
If people want to be audiophiles, that's fine, their choice but it's nonsense, especially to me who suffers from tinnitus, there are frequencies I can't hear well at all. Where vinyl is going wrong is pandering to the extreme audiophiles... 180g vinyl, single albums over two discs that play at 45rpm etc. I've got groove jammed 10 tracks a side Elvis Costello albums pressed on flimsy vinyl that play just fine for me. Audiophiles can have their soulless CDs and FLACs, I buy CDs but I'm less likely to play them for reasons I can't fully explain but like someone said above, all those bonus tracks can be really annoying, their are nice to have if you have a special interest in the artist but generally its inferior filler.