Guilty as charged, Segundo, I AM biased against people with political/world views different than my own. I believe most of them are vulnerable to propaganda and I don't necessarily hold it against them, but I definitely hold it against people who wield power and influence, like Tate and Peterson. And I've "researched" enough of Peterson to determine that he's a vapid, conspiratorial, misogynistic clearing in the woods and that despite that, or much more likely because of it, he's a hero to the incel-Q Anon-Alt Right-Andrew Tate crowd. Peterson provides their misogyny and conspiracy mongering a veneer of professorial respectability, which makes him even more reprehensible, *in my opinion*. Just because you don't agree with the majority of the posters in this thread, or me in particular doesn't mean we aren't applying critical thinking to how we form our opinions.