Now. As a jury, if we assume this to be true and the Independent have worded that correctly, Evans has potentially got consent, since he asked Mr McDonald if he wanted to have sex with her. However, it's a case of who you do believe.... McDonald or Evans. Both maintain she was fine enough to give consent. Rape is not accidental, yet I'm still not entirely sure how McDonald was released - unless he was able to convince the jury his actions were consensual. Other than that, it can only be speculation.
I've read this 3 times and it doesn't make sense. If Evans asks McDonald if he could shag the girl he raped her because he didn't ask the girl. Given the girl has maintained her anonymity I'm inclined to believe this isn't a kiss and tell gone bad story.
Given the lousy hit rate of rape convictions there must have been pretty damning evidence to convict.