Eames

That is brilliant/terrible Rob.

Durham and Gough are by far the biggest pricks on that station - and thats with Ian Danter there as well.

I don't wanna see no camel sex pics Rob. And put you're shirt back on. :|

Brilliant. Absolutely epic. A bunch of lulus in pretty pink tops.

Rhodes would be a great buy IMO.

Meh its not the worst thing ever.... but I wouldn't want her putting it on my Coco Pops. Now man up, drink your milk and go skewer that starfish......

Do not agree on Gabby. Looking at strike for Bordeaux and Villa, respectively, Gabby bangs one in every .248 matches, while Chamakh scored on an average of every .247 matches, making Gabby just slightly better. Even more so if you consider the PL a superior league to Ligue 1. But that is irrelevant, Chamakh is shite and we will not sign him. since when did gabby average 4 goals a game? What?!?!

Surely this belongs in the "Relationship Advice" Thread?

BOF - does Wiggy want me to give or recieve?

I'm tying the noose........

I can rip it with my cheeks alone if that helps?

Why? Ive just been paid...x Make me an offer big boy....xx

Given the high profile pursuits of Raul and Ronaldinho.... this seems a little hypocritical to me.

What money has he been sat on? The vast majority of the 45m we banked from the sales of Young, Downing and other fringe players last summer Leaving a grand total of -£9m when set against the clubs £54m operating loss. Forgive me, who is responsible for the clubs operating loss? I apologise for being antagonistic but this doesn't sit right with me. Randy is - as said in a further reply to Ulver. But you can't accuse him of "sitting on" £45m in transfer sales and not investing anymore whilst the business he owns loses £54m. If we were turning a profit I would be arguing alongside you for more investment and that £45m to be put back into the playing staff. But we're not. So I'm not.

Leaving a grand total of -£9m when set against the clubs £54m operating loss. Oh right, that's a new way of looking at transfer ins and outs! It was never looked at like that under Doug Poor old Randy, i do feel sorry for him running up a 54m operating loss. Not that any of that was his doing of course. Myabe he should sell off the remaining decent players and clear it once and for all Not that you'd mind of course Well know its not really a "new way" of looking at anything. I'm not absolving Randy of any blame for the clubs financial situation, he is ultimately responsible for that, but equally, better surely that he steps in and sorts it out rather than "doing a Leeds?" Of course, when you look at who has gone out, and who has come in, you will notice that the wage bill has shrunk considerably - so I would imagine a we stand a good chance of turning a profit this season.

What money has he been sat on? The vast majority of the 45m we banked from the sales of Young, Downing and other fringe players last summer Leaving a grand total of -£9m when set against the clubs £54m operating loss. So you're telling Me that Randy's been sat on -£9m?!?! The greedy bastard!! I know! What a word removed of an owner wanting the business he owns to, you know, make money :shock:

I read this to Princess E last night and was in fits of laughter. Very very funny and educational.

What money has he been sat on? The vast majority of the 45m we banked from the sales of Young, Downing and other fringe players last summer Leaving a grand total of -£9m when set against the clubs £54m operating loss.

Right. YOU are Doug Ellis and I claim my £5. We're glad you sold up you miserable old bastard - now do one. (But if you want to mug off Abromovich like you did that glorious day when we beat Chelsea - you can sit in the stands and not say anything.)

Why?

What money has he been sat on?

Thats ok, just think how Eames and Ad feel...they sell their ass!!! How very dare you!!

If thats true..... although I don't believe the £6m sale price for a second.... its good news for the wages. What is/was he on?

Well thats bullshit for a start? £6m? They'd be **** mad.

Keynesian meltdown in 5.....4.........3......