Agree with both the above posts. I cant bring myself to enter the VT forum anymore.
I'm going to chill out for a few weeks here in Off Tropics. Kick back, feel the sand between my toes and Gareth's wind in my face.
So anyone that doesn't fawn after your every word is either thick or a school kid?
Pathetic. Just like you're supposed "inside information" which changes more than the sheets in a brothel.
You haven't heard shit. Like 90% of the other attention seeking little fucktards that take a wild stab in the dark about a reasonably well known "transfer" you then get narky when your supposed "information" is challenged.
Don't feel the need to respond. It won't be seen.
I want a swift take over to ease the financial trouble then I want mid table Championship mediocrity this season.
Next season a tilt at the playoffs, getting to the final and losing.
Then the new owners reveal they are just as financially **** as the current lot, with more fire sales and misery for all concerned.
You become numb to constant pain, it eases after a while. Having a hope and then having it crushed hurts so much more. That's what I want for SHA a constant cycle of raised expectations and crushing reality checks.
Its the National Stadium and there correct IMO that it should be in the Nation's capital.
Motorway networks like the M25,M4,M1,M40,M3? Its hardly inaccessible is it?
Its a 3 hour drive tops from Brum - you'd do that on away games anyway - really can't see the problem.
Now come come, we all know that's not true. If you didn't you wouldn't be getting all silly about people disagreeing with you.
ITKs particularly those with such obvious knowledge and reliable sauces such as yourself need the attention to validate your existence.
You are the Internet equivalent of the kid make fart sounds with his armpit in class
Consider this.... A Policeman arrests a man for murder, puts him before the Court and tells the judge that it is a fact the man is a murderer.
When questioned by the defence, the Policeman then says "well er..... He is the murderer unless the situation changes"
The Policeman's credibility is clearly an issue.
Now re read my post, but removing the word "Policeman" with "ITK" and "murderer" with "transfer fact".
You see now why people are sceptical if the best you can do under questioning is "the evidence/situation is subject to change"
Factual correction: MON did not successfully claim constructive dismissal. Both parties settled out of court prior to the Tribunal with neither side admitting liability.