Oh this crap again.
Seems to the new thing to post to dismiss any opinion you don't agree with.
Why was it the right decision? I'm also struggling to see how Vlaar is a better player.
Then you're not reading a lot of the posts. Injuries, limited funds, Lerner, MON etc.. Plenty of excuses have been made to take blame from the manager.
Agree completely with the 2nd part. But there have been people who have claimed it would be an amazing achievement, one even said he should be knighted if he keeps us up.
1) What Stevo said.
2) Dutch international defender with no obvious drink/discipline problems vs half cut Welsh international defender. I know who I'm taking.
3) Again, you appear to be taking examples of contributory factors, deciding you don't agree and labelling anything you don't agree with as "excuses"
4) Taking the opinion of one obvious idiot (assuming it was serious) or an obvious example of sarcasm (assuming it wasn't) and using it to support your dismissals don't really help your case.
As you so helpfully remind me on a daily basis there will always be idiots on every side of an arguement.